- Hospital-owned medical groups need consistent patient access across sites and systems, especially when acquired practices use different EHRs and scheduling rules.
- Effective patient access software connects the full journey, from answering calls and processing referrals to scheduling, insurance verification, reminders, and follow-up.
- The blog compares seven platforms: Confido Health, Epic MyChart and Cadence, Kyruus Health, Luma Health, Notable, Healow Genie, and Infinitus.
- Confido Health’s AI Teammates complete access workflows across 40+ EHR, PMS, and phone systems, applying clinic-specific rules and recording outcomes in each site’s system.
- Coordinated referral intake and outreach help keep patients in-network, while confirmations, waitlist backfill, and no-show follow-up support completed visits.
- Choose a platform around your biggest access gaps, test complex workflows in your own systems, and begin with a focused pilot before expanding.
- Track completed outcomes across the network, including call resolution, referral conversion, scheduling completion, and performance by site, service line, and provider.
Introduction
A patient calls the group's main number to book a follow-up with a cardiologist and waits on hold before reaching a central scheduler. The scheduler cannot see the clinic's booking rules, so the call is transferred. A referral from one of the group's own primary care physicians reaches a specialty clinic by fax and waits several days before anyone notices a missing document. An open slot at an outpatient site stays empty because no one reached a waitlisted patient in time.
None of these moments looks serious on its own. Across a medical group with dozens of outpatient sites, they become one of the largest sources of lost visits, lost referrals, and lost revenue the health system has.
Hospital-owned medical groups carry a version of the patient access problem that independent practices and inpatient departments do not. They inherit acquired practices running different systems. They share call centers built for the hospital, not the clinic. And they are measured on keeping patients inside the health system's network, where a referral that leaks to an independent specialist takes downstream imaging, procedures, and admissions with it.
This guide looks at why patient access breaks down in hospital-owned groups, what the software should cover, how the leading platforms compare, and how to choose the right fit for an ambulatory network.
Why Patient Access Is Harder for Hospital-Owned Medical Groups
Acquired practices run different systems
The hospital may run Epic, while practices acquired over the past few years still run eClinicalWorks, athenahealth, NextGen, or ModMed until migration is complete. Migration can take years. In the meantime, scheduling rules, patient records, and communication tools differ from site to site, and the access team works across all of them.
Central call centers cannot carry clinic-level rules
Many health systems route medical group calls through a central contact center. That works for simple requests, but specialty scheduling depends on clinic-specific rules: which provider sees which visit types, which days a procedure runs, which insurance each location accepts. When those rules live with front desk staff at each site, central schedulers transfer calls rather than complete them.
Referrals leak out of the network
Employed primary care physicians refer patients to the group's own specialists, but only if those specialists are easy to reach. When a referral stalls in a fax queue or a patient cannot get through to schedule, the patient books with an independent specialist instead. The group loses the visit, and the health system loses the downstream care.
Each site kept its own habits
Acquired practices bring their own ways of handling referrals, reminders, authorizations, and billing questions. Patients who visit more than one site notice the difference, and leadership has no single view of how access performs across the group.
Value-based contracts raise the stakes
Under value-based arrangements, open care gaps, missed follow-ups, and out-of-network referrals affect quality performance and shared savings, not just visit volume. Access is no longer only a front desk concern. It is a network strategy.
The Cost of Poor Patient Access in a Medical Group
Unanswered calls become lost patients
A patient who cannot reach the group or complete a request on the first call often looks elsewhere. In competitive markets, that is a lost relationship, not a delayed one.
Registration errors become denials
Incorrect insurance details, missing authorizations, and demographic errors captured at access surface weeks later as rejected claims. The revenue cycle is only as clean as the data that enters it at the front end.
Leaked referrals become lost network revenue
For a hospital-owned group, a leaked referral costs the specialist visit and the imaging, procedures, and admissions that would have followed inside the system.
Inconsistent experience becomes attrition
Patients who find the group hard to reach rarely complain. They move their care, and the loss appears months later as declining visit volume.
What Patient Access Software Should Cover for a Medical Group
Start with the full patient access journey, from first contact to a patient who arrives prepared, and ask which platforms complete that journey across every site and every system the group runs.
- Calls answered and completed. Routine requests resolved on the first call, during and after hours.
- Clinic-level scheduling rules. Provider, visit type, location, and insurance rules applied at every site.
- Provider matching inside the network. Patients matched to the group's own providers by specialty, location, insurance, and availability.
- Referral intake and conversion. Faxed and electronic referrals read, completed, and turned into booked visits.
- Insurance and financial clearance. Eligibility, benefits, and authorization handled before the visit.
- Registration and intake. Demographics, insurance, and forms captured before arrival.
- Follow-through. Confirmations, reminders, waitlist backfill, no-show follow-up, and recall.
- Work across mixed EHRs. Reads from and writes to every system the group runs, before and after migration.
- Group-wide visibility. Access performance by site, service line, and provider.
What Broken Access Looks Like in Practice
Consider Maria, a patient of an employed primary care physician in a hospital-owned group with 30 outpatient sites. Her physician refers her to the group's cardiology practice on Monday.
The referral waits
The referral reaches the cardiology clinic by fax without a required test result. It enters a review queue until a staff member notices the gap, calls the referring office, and clears it. Almost a week passes before anyone contacts Maria.
Scheduling takes several conversations
Maria calls the main number and reaches the central contact center. The scheduler cannot tell which cardiologist fits her need, insurance, and preferred location, so the call is transferred. She repeats her details and receives a callback 2 days later with an appointment.
The cardiology practice runs a different system
The cardiology practice joined the group 2 years ago and still runs its original EHR. Maria's referral, insurance details, and appointment live in 2 systems, and staff reconcile them by hand.
No one sees the full journey
The referral team saw a missing document. The contact center saw a transferred call. The clinic saw a completed booking. No report showed that Maria waited 9 days and spoke with 4 people to schedule one visit, or that an independent cardiologist down the street could have seen her sooner.
Maria eventually keeps her appointment. Many patients in her position do not. When a group depends on callbacks, workarounds, and personal follow-up lists to move patients to care, it needs a patient access platform that works across the whole network.
Top Patient Access Software for Hospital-Owned Medical Groups
The platforms below take different approaches. Some focus on one stage of access, some run inside a single EHR, and some complete workflows across systems. Each is evaluated for how it performs in a multi-site, multi-system ambulatory network.
1. Confido Health
Overview
Confido Health is the AI system of action for healthcare operations. Its AI Teammates complete patient access workflows across every site in a medical group, inside the EHR, PMS, and phone systems each site already runs. They answer calls during and after hours, apply clinic-level scheduling rules, take referrals from fax to booked visit, verify insurance, and follow through with reminders, waitlist backfill, and no-show outreach. Every outcome writes back to the system of record at that site. Because Confido Health works across 40+ EHR, PMS, and phone systems, it runs the same access standard across hospital-standard and acquired practices, before and after migration. Confido Health is live across 500+ providers and 1,000+ locations.
Key Features
- Calls completed, not transferred: AI Teammates answer every call and complete scheduling, rescheduling, insurance, and billing requests during the conversation.
- Clinic-level scheduling rules: Provider, visit type, location, and insurance rules applied at every site, including rules that central call centers cannot see.
- Referrals kept in network: Faxed referrals classified, matched to the patient, checked for missing information, completed with the referring office, and booked with the group's own specialists.
- Insurance and authorization: Eligibility and benefits verified before the visit, with authorization requirements checked and submitted.
- Follow-through: Confirmations, reminders, waitlist backfill, no-show follow-up, recall, and reactivation.
- Mixed-EHR support: Works across Epic, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, ModMed, NextGen, and others, so acquired practices do not wait for migration to get consistent access.
- Escalation by protocol: Urgent calls escalate to on-call staff according to each clinic's protocols, with context passed along.
- 20+ languages: Patients complete the full access workflow in their preferred language.
- Group-wide visibility: Answer rates, scheduling completion, referral conversion, and confirmation rates by site, service line, and provider.
Customer Results
- Dallas Renal Group, a 51-location nephrology network, began with a focused pilot and expanded to all 51 locations. It cut no-shows by 50%, recovers $30,000+ each month from missed patients, and returned 900+ staff hours a month.
- An 11-location FQHC went from contract to all 11 sites live in 30 days. 80% of AI-confirmed patients showed up, a 10% higher show-up rate than staff-made calls.
- Alpha Dental, a multi-location dental group, reached a 91% inbound answer rate across locations, with 70% of calls fully completed by AI Teammates.
- A 70-location ophthalmology group handled 58,000+ financial services calls in 11 months, and its monthly collections grew to more than 3 times prior levels.
Integration Coverage
- EHR and PMS: 40+ systems, including Epic, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, ModMed, NextGen, and Tebra.
- Phone systems: RingCentral, Mango Voice, 3CX, and others.
- Write-back: Scheduling, insurance, referral, and follow-up outcomes recorded at each site's system of record.
Getting Started
Most groups begin with one high-volume workflow at a set of sites, often inbound calls or faxed referrals, and expand across service lines and locations once results hold. Many acquired practices have no documented scheduling rules or call scripts. Confido Health documents those workflows with each site before automating them, which also gives the group its first consistent standard across locations.
Best Fit
Hospital-owned and health system medical groups with 10+ providers across multiple outpatient sites, especially groups running more than one EHR or losing referrals outside the network.
2. Epic MyChart and Cadence
Overview
For groups on Epic, MyChart provides patient self-scheduling and messaging, and Cadence manages enterprise scheduling inside the Epic EHR.
Key Features
- Patient self-scheduling and appointment management through MyChart
- Enterprise scheduling templates and rules through Cadence
- Waitlist and fast-pass offers for earlier openings
- Referral orders and tracking inside the Epic record
Integration Coverage
Native to Epic.
What to Know Before Buying
Epic's access tools work best for sites already on Epic. Acquired practices on other EHRs, and patients who call rather than use MyChart, still need another path.
Best Fit
Medical groups fully standardized on Epic.
3. Kyruus Health
Overview
Kyruus Health provides provider data, search, and matching for health systems through its ProviderMatch suite.
Key Features
- Provider search across websites, contact centers, and referral workflows
- Matching patients to in-network providers by clinical need and insurance
- Centralized, maintained provider data
- Scheduling through connected systems
Integration Coverage
Syncs provider data across health system websites, contact centers, and scheduling systems.
What to Know Before Buying
Kyruus focuses on finding and matching the right provider. Completing the call, the referral follow-up, and the reminders typically requires additional tools.
Best Fit
Health systems focused on provider data and in-network matching.
4. Luma Health
Overview
Luma Health is a patient access platform covering self-scheduling, reminders, referral management, intake, and outreach.
Key Features
- Self-scheduling and appointment reminders
- Fax-to-referral conversion with text outreach
- Digital intake and waitlist management
- Outreach campaigns
Integration Coverage
Integrates with major EHRs, including Epic, Oracle Health, athenahealth, and NextGen.
What to Know Before Buying
Luma's outreach is largely digital and text-first. Groups whose patients prefer to call should confirm how voice conversations are handled.
Best Fit
Health systems and medical groups wanting digital access and referral outreach.
5. Notable
Overview
Notable offers patient access automation for health systems, including intake, scheduling, referral and fax processing, and authorization support.
Key Features
- Digital intake and pre-registration
- Fax and referral processing
- Scheduling and outreach
- Authorization support
Integration Coverage
Integrates with Epic, Oracle Health, athenahealth, and other systems.
What to Know Before Buying
Notable is built primarily for health system enterprise deployments. Ambulatory groups should confirm scope and pricing at the group level.
Best Fit
Health systems wanting access automation across intake, referrals, and authorization.
6. Healow Genie
Overview
Healow Genie, from eClinicalWorks, pairs AI call handling with live agent support for scheduling, reminders, and patient communication.
Key Features
- AI-assisted scheduling and patient communication
- Reminders and confirmations
- Digital check-in and intake
- Live agent escalation
Integration Coverage
Deepest fit with eClinicalWorks.
What to Know Before Buying
Healow Genie is a natural fit for acquired practices on eClinicalWorks. Groups with sites on several EHRs should confirm coverage across all of them.
Best Fit
Groups or sites running eClinicalWorks.
7. Infinitus
Overview
Infinitus uses AI to make calls to payers on behalf of provider teams, covering benefits verification and prior authorization follow-up.
Key Features
- Outbound payer calls for benefits verification
- Prior authorization status follow-up
- Reduced staff time on payer phone work
Integration Coverage
Connects with select EHR and revenue cycle systems.
What to Know Before Buying
Infinitus focuses on payer-facing calls. Patient-facing access, such as scheduling and reminders, needs a separate platform.
Best Fit
Revenue cycle and access teams with high payer call volume.
Comparison at a Glance
How to Choose the Right Platform for Your Medical Group
Step 1: Name the access problem costing the most
Unanswered calls, transferred calls, referral leakage, intake errors, authorization delays, and missed follow-ups are all access problems with different fixes. Start with the one creating the largest loss in visits or network revenue.
Step 2: Map the journey across sites and systems
Trace where a patient's request begins, which systems it touches, where staff step in, and what a completed outcome looks like. Include at least one acquired practice on a different EHR. That is where most platforms reveal their limits.
Step 3: Match the platform to how patients reach you
If most patients call, a platform built around self-scheduling will leave the phone problem in place. If patients are digital-first, voice depth matters less. Most medical groups need both.
Step 4: Test the hard cases
Ask vendors to show a faxed referral with missing information becoming a booked visit, a call for a clinic with unusual scheduling rules, and an after-hours urgent call escalating by protocol, in your own systems.
Step 5: Confirm the network view
Leadership should see access performance by site, service line, and provider, including acquired practices, from one place.
Step 6: Plan the rollout in phases
The groups that get the strongest results start with one workflow at a few sites, document the rules, prove the results, and then expand. Expansion amplifies whatever is already in place, so get the first workflow right.
What We Have Learned Working With Multi-Site Groups
Start with the data
Dallas Renal Group's rollout began with an analysis of 15,000+ historical calls, which showed most volume came from repeatable workflows. That analysis set the order of the rollout.
Expect undocumented workflows
Formé Medical Center had 12 to 15+ appointment types and no documented scheduling rules. A 70-location ophthalmology group had no written billing workflows or scripts. Acquired practices are often the same, so documenting the workflow is part of the work.
Consistency is the first win
Once every site runs the same rules and scripts, leadership can compare sites fairly for the first time, which often matters as much as the efficiency gain.
Plan for the patients you serve
The 11-location FQHC needed English and Spanish confirmation calls and parent-and-guardian logic for pediatric visits from day 1. Those requirements shaped the rollout, not the other way around.
Conclusion
For a hospital-owned medical group, patient access is where network strategy meets the phone line. The right platform completes the patient's request across every site and system the group runs, keeps referrals in-network, and gives leadership one view of access across acquired and legacy practices.
The most useful question to ask any vendor is not what the platform can do in a demo. It is how much of the patient's access journey it completes at every site, and how much work still waits for staff when the call ends.
See Where Your Network Leaks
Send us your call answer rate, transfer rate, and referral conversion by site, and we will show you where patients and referrals are leaving your network and which workflows Confido Health would close first. Book a demo or browse our specialty webinars.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best patient access software for hospital-owned medical groups?
For hospital-owned groups with 10+ providers across multiple sites, Confido Health is the strongest fit because it completes calls, referrals, insurance checks, and follow-up across every site and every EHR the group runs, including acquired practices that have not migrated.
Does Confido Health work if our group runs Epic and other EHRs?
Yes. Confido Health works across 40+ EHR, PMS, and phone systems, including Epic, eClinicalWorks, athenahealth, and NextGen, and writes each outcome to the system of record at that site.
How does Confido Health reduce referral leakage out of the network?
AI Teammates take each faxed or electronic referral to a booked visit with the group's own specialists: reading the document, completing missing information with the referring office, checking coverage, and calling the patient to schedule.
Can Confido Health work alongside our hospital's central call center?
Yes. Confido Health can handle clinic-level calls and overflow, applying the scheduling rules central agents cannot see, and pass complex calls to the contact center or clinic staff with context attached.
How does Confido Health compare with Epic MyChart and Cadence?
MyChart and Cadence serve patients and staff inside Epic. Confido Health works alongside them, completing phone-based requests and covering acquired sites that run other EHRs.
How does Confido Health compare with Kyruus Health?
Kyruus focuses on provider data and matching. Confido Health matches patients to providers too, and then completes the call, the referral follow-up, the insurance check, and the reminders.
How does Confido Health compare with Luma Health?
Luma Health leads with digital and text outreach. Confido Health leads with voice conversations that complete the request, and extends reach through text and email.
How long does rollout take across many sites?
An 11-location FQHC went from contract to all sites live in 30 days. Larger groups typically start with a pilot at a few sites, then expand, as Dallas Renal Group did across 51 locations.
Does Confido Health replace front desk or call center staff?
No. AI Teammates take the repeatable requests, so staff spend their time on complex scheduling, sensitive conversations, and patients in the clinic.
Is Confido Health HIPAA-compliant?
Yes. Confido Health is HIPAA compliant, SOC 2 Type II certified, and signs a Business Associate Agreement with every customer.




